Photo: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images News / Getty Images
The Trump administration is appealing a federal court order that requires the restoration of climate change and diversity information at historical sites and national parks across the United States, as America prepares for its 250th anniversary celebrations on July 4. The Department of the Interior and the National Park Service filed the appeal on Monday (June 15) evening, aiming to pause or dismiss a judge’s ruling that found the removal of these materials violated legal standards.
The controversy began after President Donald Trump issued an executive order in March 2025, directing the removal of exhibits or materials at federally managed museums, parks, and landmarks that he said “inappropriately disparaged Americans past or living.” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum followed with a secretary’s order on May 20, 2025, which prompted the removal and censorship of displays covering issues such as slavery, Indigenous history, civil rights, and climate science at sites nationwide.
A coalition of park advocates, historians, and scientists challenged these removals in federal court, arguing they amounted to censorship and the erasure of factual American history and science. Last Friday, U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley in Massachusetts sided with the plaintiffs, issuing a preliminary injunction that gives the government three weeks to restore all interpretive materials removed since May 20, 2025, and halts further censorship while litigation continues. The judge wrote that “history cannot be faithfully told while excluding the experiences of communities whose contributions, struggles, and achievements form an important part of our Nation's story."
The lawsuit cited the removal of slavery exhibits at Philadelphia’s Independence National Historical Park, exhibits on climate threats at Fort Sumter in South Carolina, and the removal of a Pride flag image from Arizona’s Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument as examples. The judge called the administration’s actions “a dangerous precedent of censorship and sanitization,” ordering weekly updates to the court on restoration progress.